packetcable | docsis.org

You are here

packetcable

5 posts / 0 new
Last post
Anonymous (not verified)
packetcable

hi, does anybody have any experience with packetcable + asterisk? is it really worth it (in terms of tco)? does it really works? how well? thanks.

Anonymous (not verified)
Re: packetcable

zeta wrote:hi, does anybody have any experience with packetcable + asterisk? is it really worth it (in terms of tco)? does it really works? how well? thanks.

It works with basic mode. Its fine for lab but not commercial run.

... wheel

Anonymous (not verified)
packetcable

what problems did you encounter? i've been heavily testing it for a couple of weeks and it's working fine. we are a pretty small cable operation and don't plan to deploy it for our customers (it will take a long time to condition the hfc net on the street first) but it would be useful for our own infrastructure, even without g729 (interconnecting two offices and several technician's homes). any thoughts? kind regards.

Anonymous (not verified)
packetcable

zeta wrote:what problems did you encounter? i've been heavily testing it for a couple of weeks and it's working fine. we are a pretty small cable operation and don't plan to deploy it for our customers (it will take a long time to condition the hfc net on the street first) but it would be useful for our own infrastructure, even without g729 (interconnecting two offices and several technician's homes). any thoughts? kind regards.

Firstly, it does not support IPSEC for CMS security. In large scale deployment, this maybe a concern. Secondly, (althought I did not debug in detail), when I ran throught BulkCall, it seems randomly having incomplete call (ie, MGCP message lost?), hence only can reach 99%. But, hey, its good enough for small group or lab.

... wheel

Anonymous (not verified)
packetcable

:cry:

can anyone show me what steps are neccesary to have a SBV4200 get to work in a docsis network